opinion

Letter to the Editor: Jeffco candidates vague on vouchers

Posted 10/11/17

At the Sept. 14 Jefferson County School Board forum, there was much agreement across all candidates with respect to their support of many issues including school choice, transparency, student …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

E-mail
Password
Log in

Don't have an ID?


Print subscribers

If you're a print subscriber, but do not yet have an online account, click here to create one.

Non-subscribers

Click here to see your options for becoming a subscriber.

If you’re a print subscriber or made a voluntary contribution in Nov. 2016-2017, but do not yet have an online account, click here to create one at no additional charge. VIP Digital Access Includes access to all websites


Our print publications are advertiser supported. For those wishing to access our content online, we have implemented a small charge so we may continue to provide our valued readers and community with unique, high quality local content. Thank you for supporting your local newspaper.
opinion

Letter to the Editor: Jeffco candidates vague on vouchers

Posted

At the Sept. 14 Jefferson County School Board forum, there was much agreement across all candidates with respect to their support of many issues including school choice, transparency, student achievement and student preparedness.
The challengers voiced their explicit agreement with the incumbents often enough that one might wonder why they are even bothering to run.

That said, one glaring difference amongst the candidates became obvious.

The incumbents – Brad Rupert, Susan Harmon and Ron Mitchell, all spoke passionately about the unfairness of vouchers and privatization and how such policies would siphon off district funds to private schools and for-profit interests.
These policies would provide financial benefit disproportionately to the more affluent students and families in our district and would further disadvantage the special needs and less privileged students and families who for many reasons do not and will not have access to private school education – with vouchers or without.

It is true that the challengers did not directly advocate for school vouchers and privatization.

However, when given the opportunity to stand up for our public schools they dodged the direct, simple question and chose instead to pledge support to Colorado’s state constitution – an inconsequential platitude, unresponsive to what was asked.

I can only assume that if either of these candidates were elected to the board they would expend prodigious energy, effort and political capital in pushing a voucher-driven, privatization agenda (relentlessly pursued by previously recalled BOE members) that would weaken our public schools and put our most vulnerable students at a disadvantage.

Dave Coren,
Golden

Dave Coren

Comments

No comments on this story | Please log in to comment by clicking here
Please log in or register to add your comment