Letter: Amending Alcorn

Posted 2/1/17

Mr. Alcorn you write to solve the problems of the USA debate, all we need is to avoid name calling? "Sorry Charlie" (excuse term usage if outside of today's "pocket brains") but that is the crux of …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

E-mail
Password
Log in

Don't have an ID?


Print subscribers

If you're a print subscriber, but do not yet have an online account, click here to create one.

Non-subscribers

Click here to see your options for becoming a subscriber.

If you’re a print subscriber or made a voluntary contribution in Nov. 2016-2017, but do not yet have an online account, click here to create one at no additional charge. VIP Digital Access Includes access to all websites


Our print publications are advertiser supported. For those wishing to access our content online, we have implemented a small charge so we may continue to provide our valued readers and community with unique, high quality local content. Thank you for supporting your local newspaper.

Letter: Amending Alcorn

Posted

Mr. Alcorn you write to solve the problems of the USA debate, all we need is to avoid name calling? "Sorry Charlie" (excuse term usage if outside of today's "pocket brains") but that is the crux of the issue. Us putting our perspectives about fixes or truths out there as real solutions/facts.

Like Washington or Lincoln couldn't solve "partisanship" neither did they eliminate "name calling." No matter the complaints against President Trump, our Democrat Party helped elect him. This is our shared experience and Wiki Leaks releases that didn't allow choosing the most popular Democrat candidate. At issue is people carrying the information of the world in their pockets! Believing in all that's available, with media biases backing every thought and only questioning validity when it differs from what is personally contemplated, is a mistake. False or misleading knowledge and information is quickly accessible through "New Technology." It is our populous belief's proof. It's not as you suggested "our society operates at about ...", limited to "140 characters" or the majority's short attention spans. It's "Hate" by any group or person calling for further Civil Rights or protections against any other/s which is the problem of equality. Any government whose main objective is; "of, by and for all the people" doesn't needed to pick winners or losers in anything. High School's most popular vocabulary term "FU" won't help either, Michael. We have to realize media and "pocket brains" don't show all another person is, or even give "true" pictures of them.They only create personal perspectives.

Gary Scofield,

Arvada

Comments

No comments on this story | Please log in to comment by clicking here
Please log in or register to add your comment