Letter to the editor

Letter: Criticism misses key points

Posted 4/6/17

I was disappointed in Mr. Coyne's personal assessment of the Jeffco School Board. It misses and mischaracterizes several key facts and issues.  

The district commitment for teacher pay …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

E-mail
Password
Log in

Don't have an ID?


Print subscribers

If you're a print subscriber, but do not yet have an online account, click here to create one.

Non-subscribers

Click here to see your options for becoming a subscriber.

If you’re a print subscriber or made a voluntary contribution in Nov. 2016-2017, but do not yet have an online account, click here to create one at no additional charge. VIP Digital Access Includes access to all websites


Our print publications are advertiser supported. For those wishing to access our content online, we have implemented a small charge so we may continue to provide our valued readers and community with unique, high quality local content. Thank you for supporting your local newspaper.
Letter to the editor

Letter: Criticism misses key points

Posted

I was disappointed in Mr. Coyne's personal assessment of the Jeffco School Board. It misses and mischaracterizes several key facts and issues.  

The district commitment for teacher pay increases has nothing to do with Union "demands." The increases are based on factual analysis of the competitive marketplace - specifically what does it take to compete for and maintain essential talent. The board has stated this repeatedly. In 2011, a Jeffco teacher with 10 years of experience and a Masters degree earned just over $52,000. Today the same teacher earns less than $50,000 - a 5 percent drop! During the same period of time, the cost of living increase has been almost 18 percent. Note that teachers with the same qualifications earn $57,000 in Denver, $60,000 in Cherry Creek and $75,000 in Boulder. 

Mr. Coyne asserts that "management" had proposed eliminating important services and closing five schools, but failed to note that these proposals were devised and introduced to the board and the public by Superintendent McMinimee after which our board members exercised their responsibility by carefully analyzing, dissecting and pushing back on a number of the proposals. As a result of their work, all of the cuts to reading interventionists, resource teachers, programs, are being deferred. Only one school will be closed.

Finally, comparing a nonprofit public entity to a "billion-dollar" private sector company is nonsense. Our school district's "business" is to educate children, not to maximize revenues.  Public schools are subject to mountains of conflicting stakeholder input and daunting regulations. I appreciate our board, administrators and teachers for delivering substantial success in this environment as evidenced by 25 Jeffco Schools recently receiving the prestigious John Irwin Award for excellent academic achievement. This represents 15 percent of all Colorado Schools in 178 school districts receiving this award. Good work!

Gretchen Winters,

Littleton

Comments

1 comment on this story | Please log in to comment by clicking here
Please log in or register to add your comment
Smelly Marvin

Until the School Board improves its horrible reputation; a reputation that puts pay raises ahead of the kids, there will never be another successful bond issue in Jefferson county. The PRO UNION SCHOOL BOARD wrote a check when they promised raises without the means to fund the raises. The bond issue failed but the raises are still on?

Its for the kids?!?!?!? yea right.

Thursday, April 20 | Report this