opinion

Letter to the Editor: What the sixth grade shift doesn’t say

Posted 11/1/17

The “Sixth-Grade Shift Explained” letterby five administrators from Jeffco was interesting for what it did and did “not” tell us.

This “much more consistent model of …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

E-mail
Password
Log in

Don't have an ID?


Print subscribers

If you're a print subscriber, but do not yet have an online account, click here to create one.

Non-subscribers

Click here to see your options for becoming a subscriber.

If you’re a print subscriber or made a voluntary contribution in Nov. 2016-2017, but do not yet have an online account, click here to create one at no additional charge. VIP Digital Access Includes access to all websites


Our print publications are advertiser supported. For those wishing to access our content online, we have implemented a small charge so we may continue to provide our valued readers and community with unique, high quality local content. Thank you for supporting your local newspaper.
opinion

Letter to the Editor: What the sixth grade shift doesn’t say

Posted

The “Sixth-Grade Shift Explained” letter by five administrators from Jeffco was interesting for what it did and did “not” tell us.

This “much more consistent model of schooling” has such high costs to all district classrooms. Note the “shift” does little more than get the more successful Elementary School Students on the less performing schools enrollments earlier. The “Sixth Grade Bump” for Middle Schools is well noted in public education for increasing a school’s success. “Three years in Middle School” as stated “allows a student to settle” in before transitioning to high school. Exactly what the “Junior High School” concept did with ninth graders. Yes increased numbers look good but does this “shift” just create more educationally immature students in higher schooling levels like the shift of ninth Graders did last century? Yes middle schools do “provide expanded programming and elective options,” but remember the multitude of budget saving cuts created recently by removal of many middle school programs and electives.

Our present school board is desperately seeking student success increases outside of placing more taxes in our classrooms as this “shift” illustrates. I think the signers of this explanation prove, like most in about 30,000 US School Districts in our Public Educational System, more and higher paid administrative Staff are their key. Maybe sixth graders aren’t too old for elementary? “Career Readiness” is one of two goals in all public education. Wouldn’t grade additions of 13th and 14th be more helpful meeting it for students?

Gary Scofield,
Arvada

Comments

No comments on this story | Please log in to comment by clicking here
Please log in or register to add your comment